Regular updates:
DUMASI RESETTLEMENT PROJECTHistorical Introduction: Mining Development and Relations with Dumasi CommunityBogoso Gold Limited (BGL) acquired surface mining rights to the Bogoso Concession through two mining leases in 1987 and 1988 and to the Prestea Concession in 2001. Operations at Bogoso were conceived as being the mining and processing of refractory ores from three main pits on the concession, with the sulphide ore being processed through a roaster and CIL plant situated at approximately the centre of the concession.
Because the Dumasi pit lies adjacent to the Dumasi village, which would be affected by our mining operation, some degree of resettlement may be required for the Dumasi community. This involves preparing a formal resettlement action plan (RAP) and then negotiating with the Dumasi community to reach a resettlement agreement acceptable to all stakeholders. Before 2006, we carried out some limited formal consultation with the Dumasi community on the possible expansion of the Dumasi pit and the resettlement of Dumasi. However, we did not enter resettlement negotiations with the Dumasi community, which created uncertainty and caused frustration among the Dumasi community, along with speculative activities in anticipation of resettlement and/or compensation.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group | Grievance | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Farmers | Farms destroyed without compensation | Site visits, discussions with CASD*, and meetings with farmers. Compensation packages agreed and paid |
| Hamlet owners | Hamlets and day huts destroyed without compensation | Site visits, discussions with CASD, and meetings with hamlet owners. Compensation packages agreed and paid to owners |
| Fish farmers | Fish farms destroyed without compensation | Site visits, discussions with CASD, meetings with farmers, and independent ministerial arbitration. Compensation packages agreed and paid to owners |
| Community | Water quality | Analysis, with Ghana Water Company, of entire water treatment system for comprehensive resolution. Changes made to water treatment system and procedure, and additional standpipe constructed. Water is proven potable according to Ghana Water Company and system improved. |
| Community | Compensation for tailings spillage | Liaison with CASD, payment of medical bills agreed and issued. |
| Dumasi Bogoso / Prestea Employees | No training provided as per agreed MoU | Liaison with CASD, HR**, and non-formal literacy training initiated. |
| Community | Lack of employment at Bogoso/Prestea Mine | Transparent recruitment process agreed with CASD/HR, new jobs offered. |
| Farmers | Flooding on farms near tailings | Site visits and investigations, meeting agreed partial compensation |
| * CASD: Community Affairs & Sustainability Department, Golden Star ** HR: Human Resources Department, Golden Star |
||
We also developed a pro-active complaints and grievances mechanism, which we implemented for all our stakeholder communities, including Dumasi. With this process we aimed to understand and address grievances raised by the Dumasi community as early as possible:
rePlan developed a Public Consultation & Disclosure Plan (PCDP) document early on in the Project’s life, so demonstrating our commitment to pro-active and ongoing communication with all interested regulatory authorities, the Traditional Authorities, organizations, and individuals. The goal of the PCDP is to address issues in a way that is transparent, provides timely, accurate information to affected people and other stakeholders, and allows sufficient opportunity for stakeholder input and exchange. Consultation specific to resettlement planning, in turn, has the following specific goals:
Our PCDP outlines and documents our consultation and disclosure practices for the Dumasi project and includes details of public involvement activities with the Community that will occur:
The PCDP aims to improve and ease decision-making and further the community’s understanding of the entire resettlement project by promoting the involvement of individuals, groups, and organizations that can affect, or be affected by, development of the Dumasi Pit.
Following the PCDP allows us to carry out formal communications in an objective and simple manner focusing on improving communications between all interested parties, more particularly the Dumasi community.
The PCDP is a living document that evolves based on the ongoing development of the communications and the results obtained. Therefore, the PCDP remains in draft form throughout the Project and is updated and adapted as communications progress.
The Dumasi Resettlement Project involves a variety of stakeholders: Dumasi residents, farmers, business people, regulatory authorities, Traditional Authorities and organizations that could be directly or indirectly affected by the resettlement. In order to develop an effective stakeholder involvement program, we first identified the various stakeholder groups using different outreach methods required for each group (formal discussions with government agencies and opinion leaders; community meetings and forums; and focus groups with key groups such as women, youth, religious leaders, civic leaders and farmers). Through this process, we found that primary concerns differ between the various stakeholder groups.
We send our key regulatory authorities (local, regional, and national) stakeholder updates so that they remain informed about developments on the Dumasi project.
We held Initial briefings for the following regulatory authorities (local regional and central) and leaders:
We continue providing briefings to project stakeholders via meetings or through written correspondence, as appropriate.
Our key goals of the community consultation process include:
At the initial stage of the process, we used the following methods to improve community awareness about their rights and the steps required in the resettlement negotiations:
In the early part of 2007, following community forums and focus group discussions, a CCC was formed, with members nominated and agreed from all identified stakeholder groups. Capacity building sessions were held with the CCC, agreeing the Committee’s modus operandi and we held a series of workshops on resettlement issues. The CCC was then replaced by a new Dumasi Oversight Committee, formed to include natives who live outside Dumasi.
The Dumasi Oversight Committee, which has been representing the community on resettlement issues from July 2007 closed the Info Centre and since then, we have directed all resettlement consultations and communications through them.
Table of Consultation Activities Completed in 2007 - 2008
| Stakeholder | Format | Dates | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dumasi Community | Public Community Forums | March – July 2007 | Sensitization & awareness creation for relationship building between Dumasi & GSBPL – these were stopped by the DOC |
| Dumasi Leaders | Meetings with key leaders of Dumasi | April – September 2007 | Further consultation with Dumasi Leaders on procedures and project progress |
| Dumasi groups | Meetings and discussions | April – August 2007 | Addressing grievances of community members |
| Dumasi & communities in GSBPL catchment | Focus Groups | May through to June 2007 | Gathering information and concerns regarding resettlement and livelihoods |
| Dumasi | Community Consultation Committee (“CCC”) | May – July 2007 | Formation and Capacity building of “CCC” to represent Dumasi to engage effectively in constant dialogue with GSBPL |
| Dumasi Community | Community Notice Board & InfoCentre | June – July 2007 | Joint development of InfoCentre for interaction and dialogue, & establish source of information – closed by DOC |
| Key stakeholders | Formal Meetings and written documents | April – September 2007 | Continuous updates & Roundtable discussions to obtain inputs from agencies to enhance project planning |
| Dumasi Leaders | Formal Meetings | Through project period | Deliberations on community interests in resettlement and development of Dumasi Providing updates to Elders on stages of the project and gathering inputs for progress |
| GSBPL | Notice Board | 2007, 2008 | Project information disclosure to all employees to avoid speculation, and promote critical participation |
| Dumasi Community | Formation of Dumasi Oversight Committee (DOC) | July 2007 | Formation of DOC to replace “CCC” and to include natives who live outside Dumasi |
| DOC & GSBPL | Meetings | August-December 2007 | Dialogue to establish rapport for continuity since direct project consultations transition from rePlan to GSBPL |
| DOC | Training Meetings | January – March 2008 | Capacity building on socioeconomic survey and resettlement process. Mobilization and start of socioeconomic survey Consultations with DOC for inputs into work plan |
| DOC | Meetings with GSBPL | April – September 2008 | Addressing various concerns on socioeconomic survey |
| DOC | Written communication | January – December 2008 | Focus on proposal to develop development packages for community |
| National, Regional & District Stakeholders | Meetings and Correspondence | Through 2008 | Provided updates on consultations with the DOC Presenting proposed process and request for their inputs for socioeconomic survey and other project issues |
In order to progress to the negotiations phase, we need to complete the baseline, which consists of a socioeconomic evaluation and asset survey. The DOC members also indicated that socioeconomic and asset surveys would be required as baseline information before resettlement negotiations could start, and encouraged us should carry out a socioeconomic survey while continuing with further consultations. To initiate this work, we provided the detailed work plan to the DOC and incorporated all their changes into the program. However, we are still waiting for the go-ahead for the socioeconomic survey from the DOC. Additionally, the DOC requested to have legal council to support the community in the socioeconomic survey. We have offered to pay for the cost of the legal council through the process.